Response to review

I'm going to change the way my paper reads.  Right now it's almost entirely a biography, but it will become an analysis.  I will argue why Feynman is an icon, at least in the science world.  I don't think any of the suggestions weren't helpful, but some are hard to follow.  I'm not sure if I like this response technique.  I think it helps more with a discovery style draft, which I consider mine to be.  I think it can serve as a guideline or even a separate prompt focused at your essay.